Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

°¨¼ÒµÈ Ä¡Á¶°ñ °í°æÀ» °®´Â Ä¡¾Æ¿Í °ñÀ¯Âø¼º ÀÓÇ÷£Å¿¡ ÀÇÇØ ÁöÁöµÇ´Â °íÁ¤¼º ±¹¼ÒÀÇÄ¡ÀÇ À¯ÇÑ¿ä¼Ò¹ýÀû ÀÀ·ÂºÐ¼®

A Finite Element Stress Analysis of Fixed Partial Denture Supported by Osseointegrated lmplant and the Natural Teeth with Reduced Alveolar Bone Height

±¸°­»ý¹°Çבּ¸ 1993³â 17±Ç 2È£ p.473 ~ 509
°è±â¼º, ÃÖÃæ±¹, Á¶±ÔÁ¾,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
°è±â¼º ( Kay Kee-Sung ) - Á¶¼±´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ Ä¡°úº¸Ã¶Çб³½Ç
ÃÖÃæ±¹ ( Choi Choon-Kug ) - Á¶¼±´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ º¸Ã¶Çб³½Ç
Á¶±ÔÁ¾ ( Cho Kyu-Zong ) - Àü³²´ëÇб³ ±â°è°øÇаú

Abstract


The purpose of this study was to evaluate the mechanical effects when one implant fixture was connected to the natural teeth with reduced alveolar bone height. This study also examined the effects of increasing the number of abutment teeth and
the
effects of the intramobile connector and the titanium connector as they were inserted between the implant superstructure and the fixture.
The distribution and concentration load was applied to the fixed partial denture(FPD) supported by implant and the natural teeth with reduced alveolar bone height. The stress and displacement of each element was observed and compared by the
two-dimensional finite element method.
@ES The following results were obtained:
@EN 1. The greater the loss of alveolar bone in natural teeth area, the greater the displacement of FPD and the stress concentration in alveolar bone around implant, especially at the stress concentration in the mesial alveolar bone crest around
implant
fixture.
2. The displacement of FPD was increased more and that of implants fixture was decreased more when intramobile connector was used than titanium connector was used. Also the stress concentration in alveolar bone around implant fixture was greater
when
intramobile connector than titanium connector.
One implication of this finding was that the difference in stiffness of implant and the natural teeth with reduced alveolar bone height could be partially compensated in case of the POM intramobile connector.
3. The amount and direction of displacement and the stress distribution of the 4-unit FPD was better than those of the 3-unit FPD.
In implied that the difference of stiffness of implant and natural teeth with reduced alveolar bone height could be partially compensated in case of the 4 unit FPD.

Å°¿öµå

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

 

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸

KCI